the obligation of non state actors in armed conflicts

Palestinian Hamas and Islamic Jihad sent congratulatory notes. So did Somalia’s al-Shabab, whose websites closely followed and hailed the Taliban’s battlefield progress and victory for weeks.

Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), an anti-Pakistan group operating in both Pakistan and Afghanistan with close connections to the Haqqani network (one of the Taliban’s power poles) extolled the Taliban’s success. and international forces.Īround the world, jihadis touted the Taliban’s defeat of the U.S. Long gaining battlefield momentum as Afghan security forces remained ridden with problems and Afghan politicians remained caught up in parochial struggles, the Taliban took Kabul and the rest of the country amidst the departure of U.S. What Taliban victory means for other nonstate armed actorsĢ021’s fundamental development in the nonstate actor space was the Taliban’s dramatic defeat of the Afghan government. But the Russian and Chinese interventions are also unlikely to succeed, and nonstate armed actors governing large territories and populations remain a key feature of the international landscape. With a rejection of the West’s prescription of democracy, human rights, and accountability, Russia and China are stepping into stabilization efforts in different ways, even as geopolitical realities pull the West’s attention away.

The obligation of non state actors in armed conflicts